Janice Griffith Lawsuit: Full Case Breakdown
Model and performer Janice Griffith sued Hustler Magazine’s parent company and social media personality Dan Bilzerian after a staged rooftop photo shoot left her with a broken foot. The Janice Griffith lawsuit was a straightforward individual personal injury case, not a class action, and it moved through a Los Angeles County courtroom over roughly a year before ending in a private settlement.
The case drew national entertainment and legal-news coverage because of Bilzerian’s public profile as a self-styled “King of Instagram” and poker player, and because it was reportedly the second personal injury lawsuit filed against him that same month in December 2014.
If you’re researching other individual personal-injury lawsuits involving public figures, our coverage of the Kim Muratori Mercedes-Benz lawsuit shows a similar pattern of an individual plaintiff pursuing a negligence claim through the civil court system.
One fact worth knowing: Griffith was 18 years old at the time of the incident, and according to the original Courthouse News report on the case, she filed the lawsuit under her stage name, without disclosing her legal name in the complaint.
Quick Facts
| Detail | Information |
| Plaintiff | Janice Griffith (stage name) |
| Defendants | LFP Internet Group LLC / LFP Publishing Group LLC (Hustler Magazine’s parent company); Dan Bilzerian |
| Court | Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles (Stanley Mosk Courthouse) |
| Case Type | Individual personal injury/negligence lawsuit — not a class action |
| Core Allegation | Bilzerian threw Griffith off the roof of his home during an April 2014 Hustler photo shoot, breaking her foot |
| Filing Date | December 16, 2014 |
| Outcome | Dismissed with prejudice following settlement, December 2015 |
What Is the Janice Griffith Lawsuit About?
The Janice Griffith lawsuit centers on an April 23, 2014 photo shoot for Hustler Magazine at Dan Bilzerian’s Hollywood Hills home. According to her complaint, Griffith, then 18 years old, was thrown off the roof of the house as part of the staged shoot and broke her foot as a result.
Roughly eight months later, on December 16, 2014, Griffith’s attorney filed a civil complaint in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, naming both LFP Internet Group LLC (doing business as Hustler Magazine) and Bilzerian as defendants. The original Courthouse News report on the filing noted this was reportedly the second personal injury lawsuit against Bilzerian that same month, following a separate claim that he had kicked a woman in the face at a nightclub.
Key Takeaway: This is an individual negligence claim tied to one specific staged photo shoot — not a broader case affecting other Hustler models or Bilzerian associates.
Who Are the Parties Involved?
| Party | Role | Details |
| Janice Griffith | Plaintiff | Model and performer, 18 at the time of the incident; sued under her stage name |
| LFP Internet Group LLC / LFP Publishing Group LLC | Defendant | Parent company operating Hustler Magazine |
| Dan Bilzerian | Defendant | Poker player and social media personality who performed the rooftop throw |
Timeline: How the Dispute Started
- April 23, 2014: Griffith is injured during a Hustler photo shoot at Bilzerian’s Hollywood Hills home, allegedly breaking her foot after he threw her off the roof.
- December 16, 2014: Griffith’s attorney files a negligence complaint in Los Angeles County Superior Court against LFP Publishing Group LLC and Bilzerian.
- December 24, 2014: Proof of service of the summons is filed.
- January 16, 2015: LFP Publishing Group LLC files a partial answer and a cross-complaint.
- February 3, 2015: Bilzerian files his own partial answer and cross-complaint.
- December 7, 2015: Griffith’s attorney files a request for entry of dismissal, with prejudice, indicating the case had been resolved.
- December 28, 2015: The court enters dismissal of the cross-complaints, closing out the action entirely.
- February 26, 2016: A related order dismisses LFP Publishing Group’s cross-complaint against a third party, Nathaniel D. Smith.
Key Takeaway: The case took about a year from filing to final dismissal, with both defendants filing their own cross-complaints before the matter was privately resolved.
Key Allegations Explained
Griffith’s complaint centered on a negligence theory: that Bilzerian and Hustler had a duty to ensure her safety while staging the rooftop stunt for the photo shoot, and that they breached that duty by proceeding with a dangerous stunt that resulted in her broken foot. The core factual allegation was straightforward — she was thrown from the roof of Bilzerian’s home as part of the shoot and was physically injured as a direct result.
Legal Claims Being Made
The lawsuit was grounded in negligence, a common legal theory in personal injury cases asserting that a defendant failed to exercise reasonable care, resulting in harm to the plaintiff. Both defendants filed cross-complaints in response, a standard procedural move in personal injury litigation that can be used to shift some responsibility to other parties or to raise counterclaims.
What the Plaintiff Was Seeking
According to reporting on the case, Griffith sought approximately $85,000 in damages, intended to cover medical expenses, lost income during her recovery, and compensation for pain and suffering related to the injury.
The Defendants’ Response
Bilzerian’s legal team pushed back on the claim, arguing that Griffith had voluntarily consented to participate in the stunt and had accepted the risk of harm that came with it — a common defense theory in cases involving staged or inherently risky activities. Bilzerian’s attorney reportedly dismissed the claim as “frivolous” at the time.
Court and Case Details
| Field | Detail |
| Case Name | Janice Griffith v. LFP Internet Group LLC et al. |
| Court | Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles (Stanley Mosk Courthouse) |
| Presiding Judges | Michael J. Raphael and Gail Feuer |
| Filed | December 16, 2014 |
| Case Type | Civil — Personal Injury and Torts |
| Final Dismissal | December 28, 2015 (with prejudice) |
Current Legal Status / Latest Update
The case has been fully resolved since 2015–2016. Court records show the action was dismissed with prejudice in late December 2015, following a request for dismissal filed by Griffith’s attorney on December 7, 2015 — procedural language that strongly indicates the parties reached a private settlement, since a voluntary dismissal with prejudice typically follows a resolved case rather than an abandoned one. No public settlement terms or court verdict were ever disclosed.
Key Takeaway: Like many personal injury disputes involving public figures, this case appears to have ended in a confidential settlement rather than a public trial or judgment — a common outcome that avoids the cost, delay, and publicity risk of proceeding to trial for both sides.
What Could Happen Next in This Case
Because the case was dismissed with prejudice in 2015, it is fully closed, and Griffith would be barred from refiling the same claims against these defendants. There is no ongoing litigation between these parties to track, and no further legal developments would be expected absent a completely new, separate dispute.
Similar or Related Cases for Context
This lawsuit was reportedly the second personal injury claim filed against Bilzerian in December 2014 alone, following a separate incident in which a woman alleged he kicked her in the face at a nightclub — an indication that Bilzerian faced a pattern of personal injury litigation tied to his public persona and social activities during this period, independent of this specific Hustler photo shoot case.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Janice Griffith lawsuit about?
The Janice Griffith lawsuit was a personal injury and negligence claim filed after Griffith, then 18, broke her foot when Dan Bilzerian threw her off the roof of his Hollywood Hills home during an April 2014 Hustler Magazine photo shoot. She sued both Bilzerian and Hustler’s parent company, LFP Internet Group LLC, in Los Angeles County Superior Court in December 2014.
Who is involved in the Janice Griffith lawsuit?
The plaintiff is Janice Griffith, a model and performer who filed the suit under her stage name. The defendants are LFP Internet Group LLC (doing business as Hustler Magazine) and Dan Bilzerian, the poker player and social media personality who performed the rooftop throw during the photo shoot.
What was Janice Griffith seeking in damages?
According to reporting on the case, Griffith sought approximately $85,000 in damages to cover medical expenses, lost income during her recovery, and compensation for pain and suffering associated with her broken foot.
What happened when the case reached its conclusion?
The case did not go to trial. Court records show Griffith’s attorney filed a request for dismissal with prejudice in December 2015, and the action was formally dismissed by late December 2015. This procedural pattern strongly suggests the parties reached a confidential settlement, though no public settlement terms or dollar amount were ever disclosed.
What is the current status of the Janice Griffith lawsuit?
The case is fully closed. It was dismissed with prejudice in December 2015, roughly a year after it was filed, following what court records suggest was a private settlement between Griffith and the defendants. No further litigation between these parties over this incident has been reported since.
The Bottom Line on This Case
The Janice Griffith lawsuit is a resolved, individual personal injury case — not an ongoing legal matter, and not something that offers any compensation process for other people to join.
What makes it a useful case study is how it illustrates a common pattern in personal injury litigation involving public figures: a filed complaint, defense arguments centered on consent and assumption of risk, procedural cross-complaints from both defendants, and an eventual private resolution that avoided a public trial.
Readers researching this case today are looking at closed litigation from 2014–2015, fully wrapped up by early 2016, with no public record of a trial verdict or disclosed settlement amount — consistent with how many similar entertainment-industry personal injury disputes are ultimately resolved.
Read: Emotional Distress Lawsuit
Read: Janice Griffith Lawsuit
Read: Primal Queen Lawsuit
Read: DOJ Lawsuit S&K Towing
Read: Affirm Lawsuit
Sources
- [Model Sues Hustler — Courthouse News Service](https://www.courthousenews.com/model-sues-hustler/)
- [Janice Griffith v. LFP Internet Group LLC et al. — PlainSite docket](https://www.plainsite.org/dockets/2vvwdda5o/superior-court-of-california-county-of-los-angeles/janice-griffith-v-lfp-internet-group-llc-et-al/)
- [Janice Griffith vs LFP Internet Group LLC et al — UniCourt](https://unicourt.com/case/ca-la2-janice-griffith-vs-lfp-internet-group-llc-et-al-223246)
- [‘King Of Instagram’ Sued For Allegedly Throwing A Naked Woman Off Of A Roof: Report — Yahoo Finance Singapore](https://sg.finance.yahoo.com/news/king-instagram-sued-allegedly-throwing-224150491.html)
